To What Extent Is Your View of World History Marxist?

Gobeki Tepe pillars
Gobeki Tepe pillars

Consider the narrative of human history that shapes your understanding of how our current, technologically advanced society came to be.  We have all learned that mankind began in a primitive state, separating ourselves from our ape-like ancestors as our craniums grew in size.  After countless years of hunting and gathering, subsisting from nature much like other animals do, eventually we learned how to grow crops and domesticate certain animals, and thus were able to establish more permanent dwelling places.  As our agricultural practices became more efficient, our economic activities expanded beyond growing food and building shelter, and craftsmen emerged molding the raw materials of nature into useful tools and products, and with the craftsmen came merchants who found markets for these products while returning with desirable goods from distant lands.  A mostly agrarian economy endured for thousands of years, and serfdom was replaced by slavery, until the scientific revolution spawned the industrial revolution, rendering slave labor unnecessary and transforming the economy from an agricultural base to a manufacturing one.  And so on…

Paralleling this tale of economic progress is a story of cultural progress toward greater enlightenment.   As our economy developed and technology advanced, we began to develop more sophisticated systems of religious doctrines and rituals; superstitious, pagan polytheism was replaced by a more rational monotheism that unified diverse culture; mythological explanations gave way to philosophical and then scientific explanations; and cave drawings became the Mona Lisa and St. Peter’s Basilica.  In other words, as the economy became more technologically sophisticated, mankind also became more culturally sophisticated.

One of the many benefits of studying philosophy is that it gives you the conceptual tools to reconsider and evaluate beliefs that one may take for granted.  My Theory of Knowledge course exposes students to and equips them to deal reflectively and critically with controversies surrounding the nature, creation, production, and dissemination of knowledge.  In our lesson on Karl Marx, the knowledge issue I posed to them was “Which is more fundamental – material knowledge or cultural knowledge?”  Marx’s answer was clear:  the material (or economic) provides the basis of society while culture (which includes art, religion, philosophy, politics) is the superstructureWhile he described how the two influence each other dialectically, he believed that material/economic progress is the driver of cultural progress.  

As I was exploring Marxist philosophy with my students, it occurred to me, in a flash of insight (which is another great benefit to teaching this class – I acquire spontaneous fresh understandings frequently), how Marxist our default view of history, described above, really is (I joked with my students how ironic this is considering how ‘Marxist’ is a dirty word in our culture, especially in politics!).  Our cultural default view of history is one of material/technological progress enabling and liberating cultural progress.   

This thought brought to mind a National Geographic article (“Birth of Religion” June 2011) I read about a potentially paradigm-shifting archeological find in central Turkey.  The site, called Gobeki Tepe, is the oldest known example of ‘monumental architecture,’ which means any building more sturdy and complicated than a hut.  Central to the site is a mammoth temple complex consisting of large pillars.  Consider this first-hand account of the initial excavation:

Inches below the surface the team struck an elaborately fashioned stone. Then another, and another—a ring of standing pillars. As the months and years went by, Schmidt’s team, a shifting crew of German and Turkish graduate students and 50 or more local villagers, found a second circle of stones, then a third, and then more. Geomagnetic surveys in 2003 revealed at least 20 rings piled together, higgledy-piggledy, under the earth.  The pillars were big—the tallest are 18 feet in height and weigh 16 tons. Swarming over their surfaces was a menagerie of animal bas-reliefs, each in a different style, some roughly rendered, a few as refined and symbolic as Byzantine art.

This site is significant simply because no one in the archeological community believed that primitive societies were capable of the kind of sophisticated religious practices that would have occurred in such a place.  This temple was not at the center of some large agricultural settlement, but was built by “foragers.”  Klaus Schmidt, the lead archeologist on the excavation, writes, “Our picture of foragers was always just small, mobile groups, a few dozen people. They cannot make big permanent structures, we thought, because they must move around to follow the resources. They can’t maintain a separate class of priests and craft workers, because they can’t carry around all the extra supplies to feed them. Then here is Göbekli Tepe, and they obviously did that.”

That’s why this is a potentially paradigm-overturning find.  For it suggests cultural sophistication characterized humans who were technologically, materially “primitive.”  Thus, the subtitle of the article reads, “We used to think agriculture gave rise to cities and later to writing, art, and religion. Now the world’s oldest temple suggests the urge to worship sparked civilization.”  Contra Karl Marx, this discovery implies that cultural knowledge is what drives progress in material knowledge.

This situation illustrates how profoundly our worldview shapes our understanding of history.  If, like Marx, one views humans as fundamentally material beings, advanced animals evolved from simpler species, then the notion of cultural progress being dependent on technological advancement and improvements in our material condition makes sense.  On the other hand, if one views human as fundamentally spiritual beings, made from the beginning in the image of God for the purpose of worship, and thus a different kind of creature altogether, one would expect to see cultural sophistication, especially in religion, from the dawn of human history.  Like I told my students, if the biblical narrative of history is true, the first human beings were probably the most intelligent and competent of all, and that we have, while developing technologically, generally regressed since then. 


6 comments on “To What Extent Is Your View of World History Marxist?

  1. unkleE says:

    Interesting insights and conclusions. How then do you regard the Göbekli Tepe site? Where does it fit into the Biblical narrative (it must have predated Abraham by 8 millennia)? How long was it in use? Does it put another nail in the coffin of OT historicity? Why did God not introduce his salvation history when humans had reached the level of spirituality of the builders, rather than wait another 8 millennia?

    • Great questions. I haven’t yet examined its coherence with the biblical narrative, nor can I say that even the most reliable archeological dating methods yield settle facts. You can easily find the article on for more detail than what I can remember (click on the ‘Magazine’ link first to make the search easier).

      I don’t see this finding as obvious counterevidence to the historicity of the OT. And I really don’t believe it is on such shaking ground in the first place (though I admit not studying the issue as much as NT historicity). There is another NGM article I discussed with my students called “Kings of Controversy,” which discuss the intra-Israeli archeological conflicts concerning the historicity of David and Solomon’s kingdoms, showing this matter is far from settled.

      As far as God’s activity among humanity pre-Abraham, the story of Job, which pre-dates the writing of Genesis, and the story of Abraham’s encounter with the priest-king Melchizedek (sp?) suggests the existence of legitimate forms of spirituality prior to the call of Abraham and founding of Israel.

      Anyways, thanks for the thoughtful comment/questions. Don’t get enough of those!

  2. unkleE says:

    “As far as God’s activity among humanity pre-Abraham, the story of Job, which pre-dates the writing of Genesis, and the story of Abraham’s encounter with the priest-king Melchizedek (sp?) suggests the existence of legitimate forms of spirituality prior to the call of Abraham and founding of Israel.”

    I really appreciated this comment. I didn’t know that Job was considered to pre-date the writing of Genesis, though I can readily believe it. But if what you say is true here, then there were a lot of people living before God chose the Jewish nation as “his people”. Reinforces in me the thought that inclusivism (all who are saved are saved through Jesus, but not all may be aware of that) is true, otherwise hundreds of generations were desperately seeking God but not finding him.

    Thanks again. I realise my comments have been tangential to your main point, but that’s how it goes on blogs sometimes, sorry! : )

  3. This is a great article!

    On Feb 15, 2013, at 9:56 PM, Musing and Motion wrote: musingandmotion posted: ” Gobeki Tepe pillars Consider the narrative of human history that shapes your understanding of how our current, technologically advanced society came to be. We have all learned th”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s